http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/ar鈥?/a>
If Jonah Lomu has a BMI of 32 but is not considered clinically obese then there must be a problem with the system. I reckon most rugby players would call him Fatty Fatty FAT FAT in the changing rooms.
What do you think?A recent article in the Daily Mail suggested BMI was not a good measure of health?
I don't think many players would call him "Fatty Fatty FAT FAT" as he's double most peoples' size
It is not an indicator of health
Just fat
You can be fat and healthyA recent article in the Daily Mail suggested BMI was not a good measure of health?
Wait, they've only just picked up on this? This was well documented YEARS ago, Matthew Pinsent being the "obese" sportsman in question..
BMI is a very crude assessment. I know a number of people who go to my gym, are fatter than me (not that I am fat) but who are fitter.
Surely fitness is the over-riding factor people should look at, is it not?A recent article in the Daily Mail suggested BMI was not a good measure of health?
The Daily Mail is not a good measurement of a newspaper.
Well the Daily Mail get their knickers in a knot about every little thing, so I'd take what they say with a pinch of salt. It's a scaremongering rag for old biddies and the braindead. And for the record, they were wrong about the MMR jab. So there.
And Jonah Lomu isn't fat, he's built like a brick shitehouse and there's a difference.
It doesn't measure stuff like cancer, of fitness. Just fatness. I've got a lowish BMI, but I'm far from fit. Muscle weighs more than fat anyway.
I really dont agree with that. Because if it was true that would mean that all the rugby people would be classed as abese and how can they be
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment