“How do you feel about the election?” we were asked by a friend at the pub a few nights ago.
“I have a cold. I don’t feel very well.”
“But about the election? About Obama?”
“Well, it’s great that a black man can be elected President in America. But it doesn’t exactly expiate the great national sin of slavery does it? Martin Luther King said he dreamt about an America where a man could be judged for the content of his character and not the color of his skin. But it looks like most black people voted for Obama because he’s black, not because of what he believes. Not that it bothers me much. It’s probably a great thing that 12% of the American population woke up today and felt like they belonged to an America where anything really is possible. It may be the first time many of them felt that way. It’s great.”
“That doesn’t sound so optimistic.”
“It’s realistic. It is what it is. If people were proud of America for seeing past race, well then I reckon American could justifiably be proud for surprising the world again. But from what I saw, people were more proud of Obama than they were for America.”
“So what?”
“So that’s the takeaway from this election. This election wasn’t about the deficit, global warming, or the neo-cons. It was about a vote people could make to feel better about themselves. Obama offered people that chance. The Republicans got exactly what they deserved for betraying small-government, fiscally-conservative, sound-money and non-interventionist foreign policy principles. But they also underestimated how badly people want to believe in something today. This election was all about pathos, not logos.”
“You make it sound like it was a Greek tragedy.”
“More like a comedy. It wasn’t a campaign at all. It was one long personal narrative, a two-year reality TV show with some world-class editing and producing. Barrack Obama convinced people that his story was America’s story. Once he was able to sell them that story, there was only one way it could end. Americans love a winner.”
“But isn’t he like a black Kennedy?”
“I have no idea what that even means. Race still matters in America just like religion still matters. The things that make us different aren’t always bad. Besides, that just sounds like a bunch of romance and nostalgia from people who have always wanted believe that a dynamic leader could take us toward better, more enlightened government. Don’t these people have romance and drama in their own lives? Why are they living vicariously through Obama’s life? I understand wanting to be a part of something greater than yourself. That’s why I work on the Daily Reckoning. But anytime people feel like that, they usually end up doing something stupid like burning books or drinking Kool-Aid.”
“Not always. The Civil Rights movement was about being part of something greater than yourself. That turned out okay.”
“Of course. But look, all I’m saying is that this wasn’t a transcendent election. It was a synthetic election. The power of America’s mass media and entertainment image-making machine was harnessed to a candidate for national office. Obama became a feel-good brand that would magically repair America’s damaged reputation in the world and her economy at home. But the Obama brand has all the depth and staying power of a catchy pop tune. It’s like Mountain Dew, all sugar rush, no nutritional value. You feel better but you’re not getting any healthier.”
“You sound bitter. Or drunk.”
“Not at all. Just a little alarmed. Modern politics is about the manipulation of people’s emotions (fear, hope, anger, envy, and sloth) through words and images and really compelling but hugely false promises. The Obama campaign was a masterpiece in manipulation, a triumph of style over content. McCain just couldn’t find a big enough lie to latch on to. The campaign also represents the triumph of the cult of personality in American politics. And anytime people have faith in a man over faith in ideas, it’s dangerous. We’re supposed to be a nation of laws, where our ideas — equality before the law, opportunity, freedom of speech — command our loyalty.”
“You’re just a sore loser.”
“Hardly. I lose all the time. I’m used to it. And you know I don’t even believe in voting. In fact, that’s what’s sad about voting. The high voter turnout was a disaster for people who love liberty.”
“How can you possibly say that? Isn’t voting an obligation in a democracy? I think it’s great so many Americans finally cared about who leads them.”
“I said I love liberty, not democracy. Do you think high voter turnout ensures that you get a better result or better government? Harrumph! When people turn out in such large numbers, it’s a triumph for State power. It means that people who believe the government should have a great role in your life have succeeded in politicising ever greater aspects of private life. Every problem becomes political. And every solution requires a new law. Yesterday we lCan you read this and give an honest opinion?
If it's for like, a skit or something, then it's excellent.
But if it's for like, a submitted writing, it could use a bit of work. Add in some more actions and stuff, not just constant talking. It would make it flow easier, do you know what I mean?
It's a shame the end got cut off.
EDIT:
Sorry, I'm focusing more on the writing aspect rather than the political one. Is that okay? :/Can you read this and give an honest opinion?
OOoo i likeit!!! and im whiteeCan you read this and give an honest opinion?
i didnt read the whole thing i read the first paragraph and to tell you the truth: your friend is sort of right. if obama was white there probably been more colored american votes to mcain. just because obama is black doesnt mean he is going to treat people differently. dont get me wrong this is a REALLY good change and i like obama for his believes. i watched his debates and took notes. i cried during his acceptance speech and i smile when i think we're going to have real change soon. [JANUARY 20, 2009!]. good luckk. :]
What was the point? Is it a story? An essay? A homework assignment? If it is a political statement then it's subjective and my opinion wouldn't be healthy here. The writing itself is decent. The conversation informative. However again I ask what is the point? Is it a persuasive essay, is it a denouncement of something or an announcement of something else? Some of the grammar could use work and you could definitely cough up more statistics if you are debating. If it's a story it has no setting besides pub. You don't include he said or I murmured or argued. Neither person is showing any real emotion or passion for this conversation. No one really shouts or raises a voice. Does one person yell, another look away, does either of them whisper, or look embarrassed. So it doesn't have any elements of a story so in essence unless you want someone to remarks on the politics there isn't much to say since it doesn't seem to have any real direction or form. And if that is the case you have placed this in the wrong category.
J...
No comments:
Post a Comment